Cost of Living · Updated June 2026

Salary conversion calculator with cost-of-living adjustment

Geographic pay adjustment is now a standing HR policy question: remote transfers, return-to-office relocations, and new-market hiring all need a defensible conversion number. This calculator produces it from rent-inclusive city indexes rather than vendor black boxes.

Most companies cap adjustments (commonly ±15–25%) and apply them asymmetrically – full cuts on moves to cheap metros, partial raises on moves to expensive ones. Knowing the true index ratio tells you exactly what the cap costs you.

Cost of living calculator

I live in

Comparing to

Household

My gross salary (USD/year)

Equivalent salary

–

Budget A: –
Budget B: –
Rent share of pay A: –
Rent share of pay B: –

Line-by-line, monthly

Item	A	B	Δ

Composite 2026 index incl. centre rent (NYC = 100). Salary figures are gross – taxes not included; pair with the salary after tax calculator.

Key insights

Raw adjustment = salary × (dest ÷ origin index − 1).
Corporate caps of ±15–25% rarely match true index gaps.
Downward adjustments are applied more fully than upward ones.
Uplift below ~70% of the raw ratio = purchasing-power cut.
Negotiate one-time cash where recurring adjustment is capped.

Local purchasing power: avg net salary ÷ single-person budget (2026)
City	COL index	Single budget /mo	Avg net salary /mo	Power ratio
New York City	100	$5,759	$7,200	1.25
San Francisco	93	$4,954	$8,200	1.66
Austin	63	$2,825	$6,000	2.12
Chicago	68	$3,322	$5,800	1.75
Miami	73	$3,718	$5,200	1.40
London	79	$3,980	$4,400	1.11
Berlin	56	$2,526	$3,300	1.31
Lisbon	50	$2,126	$1,700	0.80

The adjustment formula and its caps

Raw adjustment = salary × (destination index ÷ origin index − 1). A New York → Austin move at indexes 100/63 implies −37% raw; a typical corporate cap turns that into −15 to −25%, leaving the mover structurally ahead.

Reverse moves expose the asymmetry: Austin → New York implies +59% raw, but few employers grant it fully. If the offered uplift is below ~70% of the raw ratio, the move costs you real purchasing power.

Negotiating with index data

Anchor on a specific number ("the rent-inclusive index gap is 37 points") rather than "it's expensive there". Then negotiate the components employers can flex: one-time relocation cash, housing stipends for 12–24 months, or a delayed adjustment schedule.

For permanent remote roles, watch for location-based pay-band reassignment in the contract – the index that matters becomes wherever you settle, not where the office is.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How do companies calculate COL adjustments?

Most use third-party indexes with internal caps (commonly ±15–25%) and tiered city groupings. The raw math is salary × index ratio; the policy layer then compresses it.

Should salary scale 1:1 with the index?

For equal lifestyle, yes in theory – but fixed costs (debt, savings goals) don't scale with geography, so movers to cheap metros keep an advantage even at full adjustment.

What if my employer cuts pay for relocating somewhere cheaper?

Compare the cut against the raw index gap. A 15% cut moving NYC → Austin (raw gap ~37%) still leaves you ~$22,000 per $100k ahead in purchasing power.

Do adjustments apply to bonuses and equity?

Usually base salary only – which is a negotiable point. Equity is almost never geo-adjusted, making high-equity comp packages more portable.

Is this calculator suitable for HR benchmarking?

Yes – indexes are 2026 data, rent-inclusive, USD-normalised, and consistent across 65+ cities including international locations.

Keep exploring