Cost of Living · Updated June 2026
Tax and cost of living comparison by state
Taxes and living costs are usually compared on separate pages, which is exactly how people end up in "cheap" states with expensive lives. This page fuses them: every covered state's income-tax regime, sales tax, property tax, and COL index in one sortable view.
The fusion produces non-obvious winners: flat-tax Indiana (2.95%, index 91) beats several no-tax states for many profiles once property taxes and rents enter; California's 13.3% headline overstates what mid-income households actually pay (effective ~5–6% at $100k).
Cost of living calculator
Equivalent salary
–
–
–
- Budget A
- –
- Budget B
- –
- Rent share of pay A
- –
- Rent share of pay B
- –
Line-by-line, monthly
| Item | A | B | Δ |
|---|
Composite 2026 index incl. centre rent (NYC = 100). Salary figures are gross – taxes not included; pair with the salary after tax calculator.
Key insights
Key insights
- $100k nets $79,180 (TX) to $71,439 (OR) across covered states.
- Integrated rank ≠ tax rank ≠ cost rank – fuse before deciding.
- Indiana-class flat-tax states quietly beat some no-tax states.
- Effective CA tax at $100k is ~5–6%, not the 13.3% headline.
- Choose by profile: renter, owner, or high-earner math all differ.
| State | COL index | Income tax | Sales tax | Property tax |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee | 90 | None | 9.6% | 0.48% |
| Indiana | 91 | 2.95% flat | 7.0% | 0.84% |
| Michigan | 91 | 4.25% flat | 6.0% | 1.24% |
| Texas | 92 | None | 8.2% | 1.58% |
| Ohio | 92 | 2.75% flat | 7.2% | 1.59% |
| Georgia | 92 | 5.19% flat | 7.4% | 0.72% |
| Illinois | 94 | 4.95% flat | 8.9% | 2.11% |
| Pennsylvania | 95 | 3.07% flat | 6.3% | 1.41% |
| South Carolina | 95 | ≤ 6.2% | 7.5% | 0.46% |
| North Carolina | 96 | 3.99% flat | 7.0% | 0.63% |
| Minnesota | 97 | ≤ 9.85% | 8.0% | 0.98% |
| Nevada | 101 | None | 8.2% | 0.55% |
| Florida | 102 | None | 7.0% | 0.79% |
| Virginia | 102 | ≤ 5.75% | 5.8% | 0.72% |
| Utah | 103 | 4.55% flat | 7.3% | 0.55% |
| Arizona | 103 | 2.5% flat | 8.4% | 0.56% |
| Colorado | 105 | 4.4% flat | 7.8% | 0.55% |
| Oregon | 110 | ≤ 9.9% | 0.0% | 0.86% |
| Maryland | 113 | ≤ 5.75% | 6.0% | 0.95% |
| Washington | 114 | None | 9.4% | 0.84% |
| New Jersey | 115 | ≤ 10.75% | 6.6% | 1.77% |
| Connecticut | 116 | ≤ 6.99% | 6.3% | 1.78% |
| New York | 123 | ≤ 10.9% | 8.5% | 1.54% |
| Massachusetts | 127 | 5% flat | 6.3% | 1.04% |
| California | 134 | ≤ 13.3% | 8.8% | 0.75% |
How to read the combined table
Pick your dominant exposure first. Wage earners: weight income tax + rents (run your salary on each state page – $100k nets between $71,439 (Oregon) and $79,180 (Texas) across the covered set). Owners: weight property tax + medians. Heavy spenders: sales tax matters at the margin (5.8 points of spread).
Then add the index: a 3-point tax saving drowns inside a 20-point cost gap. The integrated rank, not either column alone, is the decision variable.
Representative profiles
Remote $120k renter: Tennessee/Texas-class states win – full income-tax saving, low rents, sales tax barely dents the gain. Equity-rich buyer: North Carolina/Indiana-class states – low property tax preserves the win after purchase. High earner near $1M: watch the surcharge states (MA millionaires tax, CA 13.3%, NY top brackets) where the marginal dollar loses 9–13 cents extra.
Profiles beat averages: the same five states reorder completely across these three movers. The calculator on every state page runs your exact case.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Which state has the best tax + cost combination?
For most renting wage-earners in 2026: Tennessee (index 90, no income tax). For owners: Indiana or North Carolina (low property tax on cheap homes). No single state wins every profile.
Is California really the worst?
For top earners, its 13.3% top rate plus index 134 is the priciest combination. At $100k, effective state tax is ~5–6% – costly, but the housing line, not the tax line, is what breaks budgets.
How do no-tax states fund themselves?
Sales tax (TN 9.55%, WA 9.43%), property tax (TX 1.58%), and tourism/extraction revenue (NV, FL). You pay through whichever channel matches your spending pattern.
What's the integrated math for a $100k remote worker?
Take state net pay ($79,180 in TX vs $73,877 in CA), subtract 12× local rent, and compare disposable income – the two-line calculation this site automates per state.
Do these figures use 2026 rules?
Yes: 2026 brackets and phased flat-tax rates (NC 3.99%, IN 2.95%, OH 2.75%), 2026 federal standard deductions, and current-year cost indexes.
Keep exploring
Related Cost of Living pages
- Berlin utility bills
- Cost of living in Barcelona for retirees
- London childcare costs
- Cost of living in Lisbon for remote workers
- Cost of living in New York City for a family
- Cost of living in Porto
- Paris rent prices
- Cost of living in Singapore
- Cost of living in Taiwan
- Austin healthcare costs
- Germany digital nomad visa requirements
- Czechia digital nomad visa requirements
- Estonia digital nomad visa requirements
- Lowest Income Nomad Visa Europe
- Montenegro digital nomad visa requirements
- Iceland digital nomad visa requirements
- Cyprus digital nomad visa requirements
- Georgia digital nomad visa requirements
- Nomad Visa Savings Comparison
- Nomad Visa Proof Of Income
Plan the whole move, not just one number.
Every MovingCal tool shares the same 2026 dataset – carry your cities, salary, and countries from one calculator to the next.